📊 Full opportunity report: The Forward-Deploy Pivot: Why Anthropic and OpenAI Are Becoming Consulting Firms in the Same Week on ThorstenMeyerAI.com — validation score, market gap, and execution plan.
TL;DR
Anthropic and OpenAI are creating new AI-native enterprise service companies, aiming to replace parts of the traditional consulting industry with AI-augmented engineering. This shift could reshape how mid-sized companies adopt AI solutions and challenge existing consulting giants.
Anthropic and OpenAI have each announced the formation of new enterprise services companies designed to embed AI engineers directly into mid-sized firms, marking a significant shift from traditional software providers to consulting-like entities focused on outcomes.
On May 4, Anthropic revealed a $1.5 billion joint venture backed by major asset managers, aimed at embedding its AI engineers into mid-market companies across sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, and finance. This entity is modeled after Palantir’s forward-deployed engineering approach and targets a structural gap in the mid-market segment, which is too small for the Big 4 consulting firms to serve economically.
Two days later, on May 6, OpenAI announced a similar initiative called ‘DeployCo,’ backed by a consortium of private equity firms with a valuation of approximately $10 billion—about 6.7 times larger than Anthropic’s new venture. This parallel move underscores a strategic push by both firms to position themselves as outcome-focused AI service providers rather than just software developers.
These developments come amid reports that Anthropic is in final negotiations for a $40-50 billion funding round, potentially valuing the company at over $900 billion, with a possible IPO as early as October 2026. The coordinated timing of these announcements suggests a deliberate effort to shape investor perception and establish a durable revenue trajectory through enterprise deployment, compute capacity, and vertical productization.
Same week.
Two consulting firms.
Anthropic and OpenAI synchronized $5.5B in commitments to rebuild the consulting industry from scratch — backed by ~$10 trillion in aggregate AUM.
May 4 · $1.5B Anthropic vehicle with Blackstone + Hellman & Friedman + Goldman Sachs as founding partners. OpenAI’s “DeployCo” announced hours earlier — $4B at $10B valuation, 6.7× larger. Both use Palantir’s forward-deployed engineering model. Captive customer pipeline through PE portfolio ownership = unprecedented enterprise software moat.
Two ventures. One opportunity.
The most concentrated assembly of private capital ever announced for AI services. Captive customer pipeline through PE portfolio ownership is the structural moat — when the PE firm owns both the services firm AND the customer, traditional buyer-seller dynamics break down.
- Anthropic$300M · founder
- Blackstone$300M · $1.3T AUM
- Hellman & Friedman$300M · $115B AUM
- Goldman Sachs AM$150M · $625B alts
- General Atlantic~$150M · $80B+
- Apollo + Leonard Green+ GIC + Sequoia
overlap
- OpenAI$500M · founder
- TPG$250B+ AUM
- Brookfield$1T+ AUM
- Bain Capital$185B+ AUM
- Advent International$90B+ AUM
- 15 unnamed investors$4B total commits

The Future of AI Consulting: Emerging Trends and Technologies to Watch (How to Start Your Own AI Consulting Business: A Guide to Building a Profitable AI Advisory Firm Book 15)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Four days. Four layers.
Each layer compounds the others. Compute enables deployment scale. Models provide capability. Templates productize workflows. Services firm provides delivery. PE pipeline provides customers. The blitz is coordinated IPO positioning ahead of Q4 2026.

AI Engineering: Building Applications with Foundation Models
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Five tiers. Five trajectories.
The disruption is uneven by tier. Indian IT faces structural threat (cost-arbitrage labor model obsolescence). Big Four maintain Fortune 500 dominance. Strategy consultancies durable on judgment work. Palantir’s FDE model gets validation premium.
AI deployment platform for mid-sized companies
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Three scenarios. One restructuring.
Whether the captive customer model scales as projected or faces execution constraints. Both vehicles likely achieve material scale rather than one collapsing — the structural setup is overwhelming.
- 1,500-2,500 deploymentsBy end-2027 across portfolio.
- 3-6 month deliveryVs 12-18 months traditional.
- Big 4 mid-market compressesIndian IT down 30-40%.
- JV revenue $1-2B by 2028Material IPO contribution.
- Outcome: October 2026 IPO at $900B+. JV is bull case.
- 800-1,500 deploymentsBy end-2027.
- Bifurcated marketFDE entities + traditional SI both grow.
- Big 4 deepen alt-AI partnershipsAccenture+OpenAI; Deloitte+Google.
- JV revenue $400-800M by 2028Supporting narrative.
- Outcome: IPO proceeds. JV is one of several threads.
- Engineering scaling hardFDE talent the binding constraint.
- PE governance frictionMultiple sponsors create overhead.
- Big 4 defends aggressivelyPricing competition compresses.
- JV revenue $100-300M by 2028Underperforms projections.
- Outcome: IPO valuation hit. Potential 2027 delay.
This is the most aggressive enterprise distribution play in tech history, executed in synchronized fashion within hours of each other, backed by approximately $10 trillion in aggregate AUM. The captive customer move is the new structural moat for AI commercialization. Everything else is supporting infrastructure.

Understanding Artificial Intelligence: Fundamentals, Use Cases and Methods for a Corporate AI Journey (Future of Business and Finance)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Four assignments. By role.
Track 90-180 day customer traction.
Anthropic IPO valuation case strengthens materially. The captive distribution channel adds structural multi-year revenue visibility worth plausibly $500M-$2B incremental ARR by Q4 2027. Q4 2026 IPO probability rises from ~50% pre-announcement to ~65-70% post-announcement. Verify execution before drawing valuation conclusions.
Form competing vehicles or cede captive economics.
KKR, Carlyle, Vista, Thoma Bravo, Silver Lake, Warburg Pincus face strategic choice. Form parallel vehicles with smaller AI labs (Mistral, Cohere, xAI) or with Microsoft/Google/Meta as model partners. Or accept structural disadvantage. The captive customer model is the new value-creation default.
Equity-aligned partnerships and vertical specialization.
Big 4 — deepen alt-AI partnerships (Accenture-OpenAI, Deloitte-Google likely). Indian IT — pivot to AI-native delivery aggressively or face 25-40% market cap compression. Mid-market integrators (EPAM, Genpact) face direct competition; vertical specialization in regulated industries (defense, government, large healthcare) is the defensible position.
PE-owned companies face accelerated AI deployment.
If your company is owned by Blackstone, H&F, Apollo, GA, Leonard Green, GIC, Sequoia — direct JV engagement arriving 12-24 months. If OpenAI DeployCo’s PE backers — same. Reskill toward judgment-intensive roles. The Atlassian template applies — workforce composition reshape, not just headcount cut. 15-25% restructuring across PE-portfolio companies over 2026-2030.
Disrupting the Traditional Consulting Industry
This shift indicates a fundamental transformation of the consulting landscape, where AI-native firms aim to capture a significant share of the estimated $1.4 trillion global IT services market. By embedding AI engineers directly into client organizations, these companies seek to deliver outcomes more efficiently than traditional consultancies, especially in the lucrative mid-market segment. This could erode the market share of the Big 4 and other major system integrators, reshaping the competitive dynamics of enterprise consulting and digital transformation.
Strategic Moves in AI-Driven Enterprise Services
The formation of these joint ventures follows a pattern of strategic announcements by Anthropic and OpenAI, positioning themselves as comprehensive enterprise partners. Anthropic’s existing relationship with the Claude Partner Network—comprising major consultancies like Accenture, Deloitte, and PwC—continues, but the new JV is an equity stake, giving Anthropic more control and direct ownership of deployment efforts. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s DeployCo, backed by large PE commitments, aims to capitalize on the mid-market opportunity that is underserved by traditional consulting firms.
This coordinated push reflects a broader industry trend: shifting from licensing AI software to delivering outcome-based solutions that integrate AI engineering directly into clients’ operations. The timing aligns with Anthropic’s reported plans for a multi-billion-dollar funding round and potential IPO, emphasizing the importance of enterprise revenue streams in their growth strategy.
“The structural shift toward AI-native enterprise services signifies a fundamental change in how companies will adopt and deploy AI, potentially replacing parts of the traditional consulting industry.”
— Thorsten Meyer
Unclear Impact on Existing Consulting Giants
It remains uncertain how quickly and extensively these AI-native enterprise service companies will displace traditional consulting firms like McKinsey, BCG, and the Big 4. While initial moves target the mid-market segment, the long-term market share shifts and competitive responses from established players are still developing. Additionally, the precise scope and scale of client adoption are not yet fully clear, as these ventures are in early stages of deployment and expansion.
Next Steps in Industry Adoption and Competitive Response
Over the coming months, further announcements are expected regarding client wins, funding rounds, and potential IPO plans by Anthropic. The industry will closely watch how traditional consulting firms respond—whether through partnerships, acquisitions, or enhanced AI offerings. Monitoring client adoption rates and the evolution of these ventures will be key to understanding their ultimate impact on enterprise AI deployment and consulting market dynamics.
Key Questions
How do these new ventures differ from traditional consulting firms?
They embed AI engineers directly into client organizations to deliver outcomes, leveraging AI-native technology and ownership models, unlike traditional firms that primarily provide advice and project management.
Will these AI-native companies replace existing consulting giants?
It is uncertain; they are targeting the mid-market segment and aim to complement or challenge existing firms, but full displacement will depend on client adoption and industry responses.
What sectors are these ventures targeting?
The initial focus is on healthcare, manufacturing, financial services, retail, and real estate—sectors where mid-sized firms are prevalent and can benefit from outcome-based AI deployment.
How might this affect the global IT services market?
If successful, these ventures could redirect a significant share of the approximately $1.4 trillion annual IT services market toward AI-augmented, outcome-focused deployment, reducing reliance on traditional consulting and system integrators.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com