🔍 Read the full analysis: How Meta, TikTok And Google Are Responding To Indonesia’s AI Bill on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok raised objections to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing on Nov. 11, according to reports. The draft would address payments for news links and AI training, as well as rules for AI-assisted works, but its current text is unavailable and no vote date has been announced.
Meta and TikTok joined Google in objecting to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, as lawmakers consider rules that could require platforms to pay for displaying news and set conditions for using copyrighted works to train AI. The draft remains under discussion, and is not law.
The hearing was held by the House of Representatives’ Legislation Body, known as Baleg, which is deliberating the bill with the government. Kompas reported that lawmakers heard from Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia. The proposal would revise Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as an initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026.
The companies’ objections cover different parts of the proposal. Google opposes payments for links and news snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licenses for AI training data. It also wants platforms to retain safe-harbor protection as intermediaries. Meta argues that sharing a news link is not the same as republishing the article, and says payment obligations could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok says AI disclosure rules should not cover cases where AI merely assists a person, and it, too, wants safe-harbor protections kept, according to the source reporting.
The press sector has disputed the platforms’ framing. At the hearing, the Press Council’s deputy chair, Totok Suryanto, said platform compliance with an existing journalism-support regulation is low, according to Aktual. The Press Council also told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by as much as 70 percent. Those figures are the council’s claims, not independently established measurements in the material available.
Indonesia’s copyright bill puts platforms and AI in focus
Google, Meta and TikTok objected to parts of a proposed copyright-law revision. The bill remains under discussion, and its current text is unavailable.
What the platforms challenge
Their objections cover proposed news payments, AI rules and protections for platforms.
News links and AI training
Opposes payments for links and snippets, mandatory AI training licenses and a single licensing body; it also seeks safe-harbor protection.
Links are not republication
Argues that paying for shared news links could reduce publisher traffic and revenue.
Disclosure and safe harbor
Says disclosure rules should not cover AI that merely assists a person, and supports retaining safe-harbor protections.
What an earlier draft described
A July version reported by Reuters was authentic but non-final; its provisions may have changed.
It proposed addressing imitation of a creator’s distinctive style and disclosure of AI use.
AI-assisted works would need a human-involvement threshold; fully AI-generated works would be excluded from that proposed protection.
The earlier draft proposed fair-use provisions or licensing for copyrighted material used to train AI.
The news revenue dispute
Publishers rely on advertising and audiences arriving from search and social platforms.
- Platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising.
- Traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by as much as 70 percent.
- Payment duties could reduce referrals or make news harder to find.
- These are claims in the debate, not established outcomes.
Where the bill stands
Baleg and the government are still deliberating the proposal.
News Links and AI Training at Stake
The proposal could alter how Indonesian publishers are paid when major platforms display or aggregate their reporting, including through links and previews. That matters because publishers rely on both advertising and audiences arriving from search and social platforms. The Press Council’s comments point to a dispute over how much value platforms capture from news and how much traffic they send back; the companies, in turn, argue that payment duties could make news harder to find or reduce referrals.
The AI provisions could also affect developers, creators and rights holders. A requirement to license copyrighted material for training could change the cost and availability of data for AI systems, while rules on disclosure and human contribution could shape what work qualifies for copyright protection. Google argues that licensing all web material is impractical and says restricting use of local data could make AI systems less capable in Indonesian. These are the company’s arguments; the proposal’s final terms and effects are not settled.
Products Worth Considering
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Bluetooth Headphones – Active Over‑Ear Noise Cancelling with Mic, USB‑C Charging, Deep Bass, up to 24 h Playtime,
Logitech MX Master 4 Ergonomic Wireless Mouse with Haptic Feedback, Graphite
DJI Mic 3 (2 TX + 1 RX + Charging Case) Wireless Microphone
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Copyright Revision Still in Debate
Reuters reported on AI-related provisions in a July draft, citing a copy of the proposal. Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, confirmed that draft was authentic but said it was not final. He described it as the first explicit recognition of AI in Indonesia’s copyright law and said generative AI had disrupted the copyright framework.
As described in that July version, the bill would prohibit AI imitation of a creator’s “distinctive style,” require disclosure of AI use in content and protect AI-assisted works only when they meet a human-involvement threshold. Fully AI-generated works would be excluded from that proposed protection. The draft did not specify how much human contribution would qualify. It also proposed handling copyrighted training material through fair-use provisions or licensing, and compensation for platforms that aggregate or display news, including link previews. These details refer to an earlier version and may have changed.
Indonesia already has Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. The proposed copyright revision would add a separate legislative framework. At the November hearing, Google referred to Articles 29 and 30 as covering payment for news indexing, aggregation, curation and snippets, according to Suara. Those article numbers are provisional: the full text currently before lawmakers was not available, and reports have cited different versions.
“The development of generative AI has disrupted the copyright framework.”
— Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, as quoted by Reuters
The text under discussion has not been obtained in the supplied reporting, and the July version is explicitly described as outdated and non-final. The precise obligations, wording and article numbers in the current draft therefore remain uncertain. It is also unclear what forms of platform activity would trigger payments, how any collective licensing body would be governed, or how a human-contribution threshold for AI-assisted work would be applied.
No parliamentary vote date has been announced in the source material. The possible sanctions described in the July draft, including revoking local business permits for non-compliant platforms, may not appear in the current version. The companies’ predictions about effects on news access, publisher traffic, investment and AI quality are arguments made in the policy debate, not established outcomes.
Lawmakers Continue Draft Deliberations
Baleg and the government are still deliberating the bill, and the next major milestone will be publication or confirmation of the text lawmakers are considering, followed by any scheduled debate or vote. The reports supplied do not give a timetable. Readers should distinguish future coverage of the current draft from descriptions of the July version, since the proposal has changed and could change again before a vote.
Further hearings or revisions could clarify whether news-link payments, AI training licenses, disclosure rules and safe-harbor protections remain in the bill. Until lawmakers complete the process and the measure is enacted, the provisions are proposals rather than binding requirements for Meta, TikTok, Google, publishers or AI developers.
Key Questions
Is Indonesia’s AI and copyright bill now law?
No. The proposal is still under parliamentary deliberation by Baleg and the government. No vote date is given in the supplied reporting.
What are Meta, TikTok and Google objecting to?
The companies have raised concerns about proposed payments for displaying or aggregating news and rules related to AI. Google also opposes mandatory training-data licenses and a single collective licensing body, while Meta says links are not republication and TikTok says disclosure should not apply when AI only assists.
What AI rules appeared in the July draft?
Reuters reported that the earlier draft would address imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, copyright for AI-assisted work and use of protected material for training. The draft was not final, and the current text may differ.
Would the bill make platforms pay for news links?
The July draft described compensation for activities including news aggregation and link previews. Google said the version discussed at the hearing would require payment for some indexing and display of news. Because the current draft text is unavailable, the final scope of any payment duty is unclear.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
